Marco Cecchinato vs Facundo Mena Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Cecchinato and Mena compare in second serve performance? In recent months, Mena has edged out Cecchinato by winning 46.71% of second serve points compared to Cecchinato's 43.21%, hinting at Mena's slightly stronger serve reliability.
• Who holds the advantage in return games? Cecchinato shows superior skills, winning 45.74% of opponents' second serve points, while Mena trails at 40.66%.
• In terms of breaking under pressure, which player excels? Mena outperforms Cecchinato by saving 60.45% of breakpoints, compared to Cecchinato’s 54.85%, showcasing Mena's resilience in crucial moments.
• Analyzing the last year's performance: Cecchinato has a slight edge with a win percentage of 52.94%, narrowly surpassing Mena's 50% win rate.
• What are their strengths on different surfaces? Cecchinato's top career success is on Clay with a 61% win rate, whereas Mena excels on Indoor Hard courts, winning 67% of matches.
• At the Challenger/ITF level, who has been more successful? Cecchinato has fared better with a 52.94% win rate against Mena's 47.62%, considering both play at similar tournament levels.
• How do they stack up against ranked opponents? Both players face similar competition, with Cecchinato playing against an average rank of 312.57 and Mena at 305.83.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, who looks stronger? Mena leads this area, securing 45% of deciding sets over Cecchinato’s 33% success rate.
• What about breakpoint conversions? Mena is slightly more effective, converting 32.06% of chances versus Cecchinato's 30.43%.

Editorial Prediction (July 7, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Cecchinato and Mena presents intriguing factors in assessing both players' prospects.

Mena shows a marginal advantage on second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, pointing to a robust serve under pressure. Additionally, his capacity to save breakpoints presents an edge that could prove crucial.

Meanwhile, Cecchinato demonstrates stronger return game statistics, particularly against opponents' second serves, indicating a formidable return game that may challenge Mena’s advantage.

Both have faced similar levels of competition, yet Cecchinato’s slightly higher win percentage from the previous year, allied with his proficiency on clay, could be a pivotal factor assuming the surface aligns.

Given these elements, the match could be tightly contested. However, Mena’s resilience in crucial moments and more efficient breakpoint conversion suggest he might have a slight upper hand.

Thus, Mena is predicted as the more likely victor in this upcoming encounter.